|
Late afternoon I boarded a plane for
Wisconsin, travelling west from New York. The blanket of clouds that obliterated
the Earth created a precise horizon line that bi-furcated the evening sky. My
window seat provided an unsettling view of a perpetually setting sun, seemingly
suspended in its course.
I pay attention to sunsets most clear days
of the year, even excusing myself from a meeting if a sunset promises to be
especially glorious. I rush home to bask in the sun’s descent among familiar old
oak trees that occupy the foreground, and the majestic Catskill Mountains in
the distance. Each transition from through dusk from day to night is accompanied
by a unique orchestration of chirps, clucks, gusts, breezes, cooling temperatures,
ebbing humidity, and clouds aglow with selections from the color spectrum refracted
from above and reflected from below.
The steady-state condition of the airplane
interior reinforced the eerie quality of the sunset beyond the airplane window.
Despite the passage of time, this sun
remained poised in a scene that was planar, unwavering, and silent. It was otherworldly,
alien to the vibrant multi-sensual experiences of sunsets at home. Then I recalled
seeing such views of suspension and isolation before. They prevail in art. Unearthly
qualities characterize traditional landscape paintings, drawings, prints, and
photographs. Such renderings of landscapes abound with mistaken impressions!
University students enrolled in 2-d and 3-d
studio art classes were anticipating my arrival. I was invited to tell them
about radical experiments in contemporary art that were inspired by environmental
concerns. Watching sunsets in two divergent settings catapulted this theme into
an exciting, if controversial, arena. I reached for the journal that contained
my lecture notes, found some blank sheets of paper, and started again. This is
what I wrote:
The
physical world, as it is delineated in most standard art curricula and depicted
in many conventional art works, contradicts the physical world as it is defined
and studied by ecologists. Artists who have long been dead are still honored
for their deceptive modes of presentation. These misleading communications are
entrenched in academic curricula, affirmed by common language, and ratified by
popular consensus. The emerging science
of ecology has shown that representational art is not representational of the
physical environment. It is representational of conventions of deceit, acceptance
of distortion, and willing compliance with fiction. Restructuring all these
arenas may be the fundamental requirement for achieving culture-wide environmental
reform on a scale that matches current environmental challenges.
For
example, misleading impressions are reinforced by courses that presume to teach
2-d art forms despite the fact that nothing can exist in the physical world if
it only has two dimensions. Height and width are always accompanied by depth. ‘Flat’
actually means that one of these dimensions is substantially smaller than the
other two. Volume is a fact of existence. It is inherent in sheets of paper,
surfaces of ponds, and computer screens.
Likewise,
lines which play such a prominent role in art instruction and art production do
not exist in the physical world. A line is an abstraction invented by humans to
simplify the task of rendering forms. Even a line of ink has physical
substance, just like the trunk of a tree, a strand of hair, and a water hose.
Furthermore, utilizing lines to delineate shape is bogus since, in the physical
world, lines don't enclose space - edges do, and edges are components of
volumes.
While
it is true that every ‘thing’ in the physical world has volume, even 3-d art
courses perpetuate a deceptive premise. They infer that identifying all three
of an object’s dimensions suffices to describe it. It ignores the fact that
objects are continually being bombarded by environmental conditions that
trigger expansions, contractions, erosions, rusting, melting, dissipating,
tumbling, absorption, and countless additional forms of alteration. Everything
that occupies space also transforms through time. On Earth, perpetual permutation
applies to location, size, shape, substance, complexity, responsiveness,
vulnerability, and so forth. Responsiveness of the object and the intensity of
the influence determine if these changes transpire quickly, as when an
avalanche tumbles, or slowly, as when bedrock erodes.
Another
fallacy perpetuated in conventional college curricula is the deceptive notion
that art is made to endure. Art instruction often includes introducing students
to archival mediums that resist change, and storage protocols that emulate museum
settings by isolating artworks from fluctuating humidity and temperature,
sunlight, fungus, bacteria, mice, and human tampering. The underlying message conveyed
by these protocols is that art is exempt from participating in the dynamic systems
that account for life on Earth. These systems are bad for art. Artists are at
liberty to opt out of responsible engagement.
In
all these ways the hallowed traditions of art and art education suppress the
unique and all-powerful forces that comprise the drama of life on Earth. Today’s
vanguard artists are reversing this legacy by inventing ways to confirm the dynamic
complexity of eco-systems. They are undertaking respectful partnerships with Earth
forces and substances to establish sustainable paradigms for maintaining human
populations. Some artists may choose to design
eco life styles, eco value systems, eco standards
of conduct. They may invent strategies for crisis management and aversion. Others
may construct eco models of work based on crafting, collaborating, reusing, and
sharing. Still others may introduce new forms of delight, celebration, prayer,
and exchange.
I
glance, once more, out the airplane window. Night has settled in. Uniform blackness
extends as far as the eye can see. I perceive my reflection on the glass and think
of the scale of perception-shifting that is sufficient to sustain life on Earth.
Environmental reform requires a total revamp of the way humans 'see' the world
around us. Artists can help lay to rest the old habits of separating dimensions
of height, width, and depth. They can make all components
of the physical environment contingent on context. They can help visualize
that context as a system that is perpetually and unpredictably evolving.
Add as favourites (105) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 317
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |