|
“This is not only
the greatest of Whitney Biennials, it is the greatest show ever produced by the
Whitney Museum.”
Charlie Finch, 2010 artnet
“Unfortunately - and
there's no gentle way to put this - the show as a whole is a debacle…. bad - in
so many ways it exhausts one's powers of discrimination”
Sebastian Smee, The Boston Globe
“(The Whitney Biennial) avoids razzmatazz,
star power, and high production….The art world has clamored for these things
for years, and people should cheer this show.”
Jerry Saltz, New York Magazine Art Review
“The show lives up -
or down - to its billing. It has no theme; its catalog is slight; its
installation, Spartan.
Spectacle is out. Much of what's in is quiet and
hermetic to the point of initially looking blank.”
Holland Cotter, The New York Times Company
To those readers who conclude that such rankling proves that judgments
about art are merely indulgences in personal preference, please wait. I would
like to propose an alternative explanation for the ludicrous discrepancies regarding
the current Whitney Biennial - the fact that the artworks selected for the Biennial are divorced
from the crucial issues of our time. As such, they eradicate the possibility
for considered art discourse. The artworks enshrined in the annals of art
history have always expressed their era’s most defining characteristic, whether that is social/economic/historic/religious/cultural/political/technological.
I propose that instead of wallowing in subjectivity, these same
critics would have written meaningful commentary based upon rational judgment
if the art they were reviewing was propelled by the force that defines the 21st
century - environmentalism.
The Avant-Guardians series highlights my belief that concerns
regarding the planet’s waters, air, soil, climate, and wildlife
distinguish our era from all previous eras. The threats to their welfare are so
urgent and so severe that countless artists are rallying on their behalf. Their
artworks take the form of creative solutions to environmental problems.
If the Whitney Biennial curators sought art at the forefront of
cultural change, they would have discovered an outpouring of artistic innovation that is being inspired by
the thematic, material, and aesthetic environmentalism. These are the artists who are likely to be
revered in future annals of art history. Love it or hate it, the Biennial is
hopelessly provincial.
Add as favourites (40) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 148
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |