|
Designed by
Based on a template by: |
|
| |
|
TOBIAS and DAD?
or
TOBIAS and MOM?
Tragedy describes the short life of Rolling
Thunder – the wayward, day-old, intrepid orphan goose whose short life qualifies
him to be celebrated for courage that far outweighed his
three-ounce physique. On day ten of his brief life he wandered from the flock and was
never seen again.
Uncanny good luck has, thus far,
blessed his counterpart – the sole survivor of a hatching by our domestic
turkeys. Tobias’s five siblings literally vanished in the air. They were swept
up into the beak of a hawk who visited the clutch each day for a tasty dinner.
Perhaps Tobias was unharmed because he
was puny and unappetizing.
Mom turkey was devoted to her
maternal task while she sat on the eggs and while she tended the
chicks, even as they disappeared on by one. Dad turkey, on the other hand, completely ignored Mom throughout the long weeks of nesting. But the
instant the first chick hatched, he assumed the role of super macho guardian
protector. With a devotion bordering on vengeance, Dad puffed his chest, spread his mighty feathers, and strutted
in circles around his offspring holding his wings low against the ground so that they made a
rumbling sound. The waddles
surrounding Dad's face filled with the blood of paternal pride, turning a deep
purple-red. Any potential threat was greeted with a terrifying cackle. And thus, the
little family was bonded.
Then, I was awakened one morning by the
sounds of Tobias cheeping in distress and the sight of Mom’s white feathers
scattered in clumps across the meadow. These are the tell-tale signs of a fox
attack. Dad's ruffled featheres showed he, too, had been involved in the fray, but survived.
Once again I faced a the dilemma I encountered
with Rolling Thunder. The choice lay between caging the infant (protection
plus his misery), or allowing him to be free (risk plus his happiness). As I debated the
alternatives, I noted that Dad had suddenly abandoned his masculine posturing. His
body assumed the proportions of a female. His strut and temperament mimicked
the demeanor of a female. He was gobbling softly like a female. He was tending
to the chick just like the missing Mom!
This surrogate Mom knew precisely how to lead the youngster to food and water, and where to find protection from the rain. He/She immediately abandoned his/her favority nighttime roosting place on a high railing. Instead, he/she settled down in a protected spot in the midst of the irises with his/her wing outstretched just enought to shelter the baby who was not yet able to fly. As the days passed, Tobias became strong enough to scale the heights of Dad's/Mom's back where he settled into the soft feathers fo afternoon naps while Dad/Mom sat as still as a four poster bed.
Yesterday another landmark was achieved. Tobias
fluttered his newly sprouted feathers and flew for a few yards. Last night, Dad/Mom
resumed his/her favorite sleeping location on the high rais with the flight-worthy Tobias at his
side.
....Another amazing adventure from staying at home.
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (72) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 272 |
| |
|
|
 
Photo:Hans Silvester Andy Goldsworthy Photo: Hans Silvester
The Omo of Ethiopia Live and Dead Leaves The Omo of Ethiopia
I believe Andy Goldsworthy’s art epitomizes the particular
kind of beauty. It affirms the alien-status of contemporary (sub)urbanites.
While
humans appear on all accountings of life on planet Earth, Goldsworthy’s
constructions and photographs challenge the popular notion that we humans belong
to nature as much as nematodes and antelopes. It seems to me there is more to belonging to
nature than being products of the multi-millennia evolutionary forces, and surviving
into adulthood to bear and raise our young.
Extolling Goldsworthy’s site-specific work reveals a delight
in beauty based upon abstract principles, not intimate actualities. It serves
an audience that satisfies its survival needs through elaborate
technological, mediated, global interventions. Its relationship to the
habitats it occupies is so remote; this audience typically behaves like tourists in their own
homeland.
Today I discovered photographs of artistry by the Omo
people of Ethiopia. Their version of beauty is penetrating and in-dwelling.
Consider the differences:
- Whereas Goldsworthy’s art is derived from brief visit to a
site by a lone individual, the Omo people’s art emerges from an entire culture
inhabiting land that they have supported, and that has supported them, for
generations.
- Goldsworthy initiates each work by undertaking a process of
exploration and discovery. He must search for material opportunities
for color, form, texture, and scale, and assess light, moisture,
wind, and temperature conditions. In contrast, lifelong familiarity is
core to the
Omo’s creative process. The materials, tools, and conditions they
extract from
their site also supply their nourishment, protection, fiber, fuel, and
shelter,
as well as their stories, rituals, and belief systems.They are already
skilled, knowledgeable, and confident.
- Goldsworthy seems to initiate each work with the
intention
of accomplishing a remarkable feat. This entails overcoming obstacles
such as
rising tides or defying limitations to his artistic intentions such as
gravity, wilting, melting, etc. Familiarity gained by life-long
practice and cultural tradition permits the Omo people to be
comfortably and exuberantly spontaneous.
The beauty of the Omo proclaims their connections to the vastness
of the living Earth’s genealogies and lineages as much as Goldsworthy’s beauty proclaims
his and our alienation from them.They are both cultural reflections worthy of consideration.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGLR8wEvRfQ
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (84) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 1835 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Two oversized flat feet, attached to two undersized legs,
sticking out of a scruffy orb of fluffy down, supporting a great paddle beak that
projects far out from its darting black eyes – - may I introduce you to Thunder,
or perhaps I should call him Rolling Thunder since this three ounce baby goose rushes
in gusts of fearless activity. In the two days since his hatching he has had
ample opportunity to earn a power name like Thunder. He had already accumulated a life-time's adventures.
We adopted this tiny morsel of a critter from
a friend who got it from a friend at church. She saw it and its sibling crossing a road. No parent goose was in
sight. The sibling made it safely to the other side, where it was promptly
devoured by a neighbor’s dog. The survivor provides the occasion for this essay.
We arrived home with our new ward still debating if we
should introduce our baby wild goose to our flock of adult domestic geese. (Would
he be threatened or protected?)
Or should we place him in the nursery with our six baby
ducks? (Would he be ostracized or develop an identity complex?).
Or should we isolate him? (He would be safe but lonely.)
In the end, we tried all three approaches
with comical lack of success.
The instant we set Thunder down in the midst of the adult
geese, he emitted faint but exuberant peeps and rushed into the flock with the gusto of
a long-awaited home-coming. Just as quickly, the mass of adults raised their
heads, opened their throats, and let out bellowing honks and squawks as they
ran in terror from this pipsqueak barely large enough to cast a shadow. His
little legs shifted into high gear as he chased the fleeing grown-ups. Mayhem
erupted. Each time he gained on them he got clobbered with a huge webbed foot only
to rise again and continue the pursuit. This might have gone on forever if we
hadn’t felt the fear that Thunder never felt for himself. We carted him off to
the baby duck pen.
The mother duck immediately removed herself from the scene
and perched high where she monitored the anticipated drama from an overview
position. What she observed was a scene that was dramatically innocuous.
Thunder preened himself, oblivious of the potential companions and playmates in
his midst. He merely acted annoyed at the interruption of his grooming routine.
The ducks nuzzled him with their beaks testing if this foreign entity was a treat
or a threat. They soon tired of their exploration and settled down for a nap. Some
ingrained monitor told these two breeds of fowl that they were as remote as minnows
and giraffes. The air grew chilly as the
sun set. Thunder would find no warmth among the ducks.
A wire cage was produced and outfitted with grain and water
and one intrepid infant goose. It was placed in the mechanical room where we
hoped fatigue would ease his lonely state. We bid him goodnight, walked down
the long hallway, up five stairs, past a small indoor goldfish pond in the entry way of the house, continued up another five stairs for a long-delayed dinner. As I was serving a “plop”,
more unfamiliar than loud, coming from the entry way called my attention. There was Rolling Thunder, floating among the fish, happy as a goose in water!
There must be is a moral to this tale.
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (97) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 338 |
|
|
Mother's Day on the Homestead |
|
Sex is not the topic of this entry. It is an hourly
occurrence between the chickens, ducks, turkeys, and geese on my homestead this
time of year. They mount shamelessly on land and water, rushing from courtship to consummation.
Procreation is the newsworthy event. This is because so many generations of domesticated fowl were bred, with determined exclusivity, for tender meat and
reliable egg production. As a result, most have lost their nurturing
instincts. Stacked in my refrigerator are dozens of fertilized eggs that
were abandoned by their moms immediately after they were laid. They
squawk or cluck and quickly rejoin the flock.
That is why, when a gorgeous white turkey named Antonia
settled down in the empty planter on the side of the garage and didn’t budge
for three days, we began to anticipate a rare occurence - home-hatched baby turkeys! The impulse to perform the
rites of turkey maternity may not have been lost after all.
Antonia’s ill-chosen site subjected her, alternately, to
rain and glaring sun. She endured the discomfort and rarely left her nest for
even a drink. Only once was I able to beat her hasty return to the nest and catch a glimpse
at her clutch – six speckled turkey eggs and one beige chicken egg!
It takes turkey eggs a week longer to mature than chicken
eggs. Antonia was about to confront a
dilemma. Was her body clock, timed to
the transition from setting to tending, set for 21 days when the chicken hatched,
or 28 when her own babies emerged? As we debated these alternatives, she
invented her own solution. It was both discerning and brutal. On the 21st day I
discovered a cracked beige chicken egg on the ground near the nest, a victim of
Antonia’s powerful mothering impulse. Somehow she recognized the foreign, ill-timed
intruder and managed to nudge it up and over the lip of the planter, banished and left to die.
Romanticized views of nurturing instincts were shattered on
the 28th day as well. One by one the eggs vanished. I could hear faint baby “cheeps”,
catch a glimpse of a cracked egg, then it would disappear without a trace. I
watched the clutch diminish – five, three, only one. Then I caught a glimpse of her flying higher
and faster than ever before with a white object in her beak. I followed her
trail and discovered a cracked shell. It contained the last baby, perfectly formed but still curled tight
with its head tucked into its little belly and its feet drawn up, expelled, abandoned, dead.
The climax of this sorry tale came today. The murderous
mother spent this entire day sitting on her empty nest. She appeared to be oblivious of her deeds and their consequences.
Antonia was hatched in an incubator, warmed by electric heat
, and fed factory mash. Perhaps the mral of this sorry tale is that there are no
surrogates for real mothers. They teach
their babies how to grow up to be tender, tending adults.
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (71) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 303 |
|
|
Why Can't Fine Art Be Functional? |
|
Can fine art be functional?
- Is
function too down-to-earth to support the lofty insights they expect from art?
- Is function too
matter-of-fact to permit poetry, nuance sentiment, sensuality, and emotional expression?
Much to my surprise, this question was recently raised by two established eco artists. They each admitted that, despite believing that innovation and change are inherent
to art, they could not make pragmatism fit their cherished concepts of ‘art’.
Their confusion was startling since one artist’s practice consists of removing
toxins from soil and the other creates sculptures that conserve grey water. Both
admitted that their work is often challenged as being functional, and therefore not artistic. They admitted that they generally
responded to such inquiries by squirming uncomfortably and quickly changing the subject.
I welcome art's marriage to function, pragmatism, and expediency. I am convinced they are essential components of contemporary art practice - the new norms not the new aberrations. I challenge the challenge of the doubters.
The crucial words in the explanation are "here" and "now". It is HERE and NOW that function and
art are integral, compatible, mutual, and harmonious.
Living artists are devoting their creativity and ingenuity to problem-solving
because problem-solving is a
key activity differentiating human behavior from preceeding periods in history. This is because today, humans are confronting jeopardies that are both Earth-wide and urgent. Today's environmental predicaments are nothing less than life-threatening for the entire planet. Problem-solving artists are demonstrating that humanity cannot afford the luxury of squandering its creativity - not even artistic creativity - when the future of life on
Earth will be determined by our ability to solve the dangerous accumulation of humanity's short-sighted indiscretions.
At specific times in the past artists helped usher souls into the
afterlife, or elevate the power of State, or promote the supremacy of the machine,
or visualize the content of the subconscious, and so forth. These missions coincided with each era's most crucial issues. The current era has
introduced another set of themes, motives, materials, and processes. They derive
from the threat of environmental collapse.
Artists creating functional art are perpetuating the only tradition
that seems to apply to art throughout the ages – it is in synch with a shifting
cultural context with a specific time and place.
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (88) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 371 |
|
|
Dead Stones / Life Process |
|
I walked through the woods this cold March morning in search
of new life remerging in Spring. It may seem odd, but I found it in the most
inert of Earth substances – stones.
Along the southern slope the surface rocks and bedrock outcroppings were
shedding their brownish-gray winter coats and donning their pale green springtime
frocks. The stones were teeming with populations of bacteria, algae, and
lichen. These miniscule populations are
not mere surface decorations. They are marauders, attacking these invincible stones
with an insistence that may not even be matched by the force of jackhammers, dynamite,
and atomic explosions.
Microorganisms that colonize the surfaces of stone mine and
sort the mineral wealth that is then banked in the living tissues of organisms
that eat vegetables. It is transferred to the organisms that eat the vegetables
and to those that eat the vegetarians.
Let us celebrate Spring and the renewal of life by honoring stone’s
role in infusing life with life.
Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (99) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 366 |
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 33 - 40 of 97 | |